bad permanent makeup

%IMG_DESC_1%

nomar383

Mar 11, 09:54 AM

Maybe 30 8:25

That's not bad for the rumored 10K stock from above lol

---

%IMG_DESC_2%

edesignuk

Jun 30, 02:02 PM

Originally posted by massie

... ive herd that windows with VPC runs FASTER on a mac? is this true???

%IMG_DESC_3%

kingcrowing

Nov 30, 11:35 AM

you got another PM, and everything is cool with me an max

---

%IMG_DESC_4%

kalex

Apr 29, 09:28 AM

Yep i've seen it before. When I gave beejive to my friend he installed it on his iphone directly. so it looks like we still need to wait for jailbreak and we'll have to use some sort of installer directly on the ipad in order to load version 1 of the app since its no longer in app store

---

%IMG_DESC_5%

Blu101

Nov 13, 01:25 PM

Here is mine, my youngest son.

haha too cute!!!

Congrats on the new addition to the family btw :D

---

%IMG_DESC_6%

Cool Hwhip

Mar 28, 12:07 PM

Never. Return your iPad 2 if this will prevent you from enjoying it.

Were you raised as a quitter?

---

%IMG_DESC_7%

bassfingers

Mar 15, 04:10 AM

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8F190 Safari/6533.18.5)

Translation "imitation iPods with phone capabilities"

Sounds like imitation iPhone.

---

%IMG_DESC_8%

linnarsson

Nov 12, 05:56 AM

http://www.linnarsson.com/mac/rockingpaper.png

Here's my desktop :) The wallpaper is my own named Rockingpaper! :cool:

---

%IMG_DESC_9%

MikeMcD

Oct 26, 02:08 PM

AppleInsider Article: "The filing is credited to four Apple employees: Nick King, Duncan Kerr, Paul Herbst and Steven Hotelling."

Is this the type of thing Apple does? Thought they had more control over employee/press relations...

The whole article sounds a bit overloaded with info - is it April Fools?http://forums.macrumors.com/images/smilies/redface.gif


They just got all the information from the patent...they are incredibly extensive documents. And the employees credited are probably the patent attorneys that wrote the document. This has nothing to do with apple's control. April is not for five months...a bit premature.

---

%IMG_DESC_10%

tigress666

Apr 18, 11:14 AM

The only thing I don't like about using the phone as a steering wheel is I am turning my screen as well, so it is harder to see what is going on. Plus I am not a huge fan of the lack of analog gas and braking.

I haven't noticed the issue (I do notice that the games seem to tilt the screen too so your view stays level ;). But only if I'm paying attention). I have no issue seeing what is going on honestly.

As for the analog gas and braking, gotta agree. Need for Speed Shift lets you try braking for yourself (I actually let it brake for me), but all of them just do the gas pressing for you. Honestly because here is a weakness, there is no real way to implement a way to easily press gas and do the other stuff which is why they do that. Actually, I could see a way of doing it (all have to be with the right hand) but then I don't see a way of implementing shifting easily if you prefer that (Need for Speed let's you shift if you like, Asphalt 5 does not but NFS is more serious and Asphalt 5 is more arcade style).

Anyways, no, it's not console quality, but it's still fun :) (and in the end, that is the most important part, is it fun?). I think I'm going to turn auto braking off soon and see how well I do with that (I've unlocked most stuff in NFS at this point).

---

%IMG_DESC_11%

rloechner

Apr 20, 10:20 AM

I am receiving the same error on my iPad2. I tried switching networks (yes I have 2 running) and I immediately receive that error message. How annoying :mad:!

update: this does however work on my iPhone4 - over 3g. I wonder if it has anything to do with wifi vs 3g connections?

---

%IMG_DESC_12%

willieva

Apr 10, 04:56 PM

From your desktop can you ping 192.168.2.2 and from the laptop ping 192.168.2.1?

From the diagram and your description, the laptop doesn't have a wireless connection. So it's a bit puzzling when you say it keeps trying to use the wireless. How are you trying to copy files, using Finder? Try scp'ing using the ip addresses you gave, if the pings work.

BTW, I've got my laptop with a 192.x.x.x address for the wired connection, and a 10.x.x.x address for the wireless. It's having no problems seeing both networks.

---

%IMG_DESC_13%

dcv

Sep 11, 08:05 AM

I was at work in the City of London. Actually I remember I had just popped out to buy a birthday card for a friend so I was in a card shop at Leadenhall Market when I first heard the news on the radio. When I got back to the office a few mins later there were people gathered in reception watching the news reports on tv and everyone was so horrified. Later that afternoon we were all sent home as there were fears of potential attacks on London - particularly around the financial centres in the City & Canary Wharf.

---

%IMG_DESC_14%

Gus

Jul 13, 12:12 AM

Then that is the ideal situation! you have no worries about erasing anything permanently through iTunes then, if you have it backed up. The previous suggestion is best then.

Regards,
Gus

---

%IMG_DESC_15%

mkrishnan

Dec 29, 02:19 PM

Some people claim that the x86 processor family is more susceptible to buffer overflow exploits than the PPC family is. I don't understand all the details myself, but the basic idea is that in many cases the core issue of security vulnerabilities is that under certain situations, data that is supposed to be "information," but not "code," in that it is put in a place where executable code is not supposed to reside (i.e. inside a graphic file, or whatever), is allowed to act as code. The buffer overrun issue appears to be an area where a number of these exploit possibilities exist.

You can see more in this thread:

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=134119&highlight=intel+x86+security+overflow

---

%IMG_DESC_16%

BeerDrinker29

May 5, 07:49 PM

I was doing my part, downloading the archive like any good Macrumor visitor would, to see if it was worth buying..

But it wont decompress. It gives me an error in X

---

%IMG_DESC_17%

miles01110

Apr 18, 06:40 PM

If it's an apartment complex there's a good chance you won't have much of a choice when it comes to picking a provider. You're likely going to be in a situation where the apartment management has a deal with one provider and you pick whatever plan you feel like paying for.

Or make a deal with your neighbors and share their wireless network.

---

%IMG_DESC_18%

Blue Velvet

Dec 17, 05:04 AM

Many of them will have inhouse teams to develop their bits and pieces.

Considering lead and production times, I would have also thought that large-scale holiday-specific artwork production would need to be signed off in June-August in order to accommodate any special repro processes and finishing... and then getting product to point of sale.

So, if this idea appeals to you, try aiming for next year and put together a lo-res sample sheet to try some cold calls with... but don't get your hopes up, there could be other more productive and lucrative ways to further your career.

---

%IMG_DESC_19%

dernhelm

Oct 4, 03:25 PM

Every cell phone sold in the US has to have a working GPS device in it, and the GPS has to be "on" at all times.


Yes, but would be better if the GPS were not reliant on the Cell network being available.

---

TheSVD

Mar 6, 03:08 AM

Hey All :)

I've finally taken a picture I want to make a large print of.

At work I have access to a huge printer that does A0, A1, A2 and A3 prints (americans if you don't use the same paper size tell me and I'll get the measurements, not sure if you do :confused: I'm in the UK..)

I have no idea how large I can print my picture decently.. I have an 18 megapixel 550d and I'd print from a TIFF file which was saved from the CR2 after messing around with it a bit (is that the right thing to do)

Basically I have no idea what kinda size it could go up to, and I don't get DPI and how changing it ends up relative to the photo quality and why you wouldn't just set it at the maximum every time..

So yeah, I'm pretty confused about this, if someone could shed some light on this one that'd be good thanks :)

---

msduncan

Mar 7, 12:33 PM

Anyone planning to wait in line at the Summit? What time are you thinking of arriving to wait?

---

fisherking

May 4, 06:18 PM

color keyboard just got an update (may4), and there are a LOT of choices.
different keyboards, even different 'pop-up' letters when you type
(some really nice ones, some really ugly ones too...:D ); even the option for custom backgrounds (which i haven't tried yet).

am loving having a black keyboard...

---

Catt

Oct 25, 08:00 AM

One of the things that irritates me about iTMS is the fact that I can't play my purchased tracks on anything other than an iPod.

This doesn't currently affect me as I own an iPod but I would like to be able to use them on other devices as well (such as AAC compatible phones etc.) . This restriction means that I do not purchase as much from iTMS as I might otherwise.

I am wondering how much extra money Apple gets from locking users of iTMS into the iPod system.

Would 'de-regulating' FairPlay in this way encourage owners of other players to buy from iTMS and would this extra revenue offset that losses from lower (potentially) from iPod sales?

---

Clive At Five

Oct 25, 09:18 AM

I can only see this as a good thing for Apple. They don't make much, if any, money off of iTMS sales. They run the store at cost or near that to fuel the sale of iPods. If some other company (or companies) can offer either (a) similar content for a lower price, or under a different business model (rental type music, for example) that works on FairPlay devices, read: iPods, then it's a reason to go buy MORE iPods. This generates money for Apple without the expense of running iTMS. Alternatively, if (b) a company is offering content that Apple is NOT offering (indie music, other TV shows, etc) then it's incetive for someone who wouldn't otherwise want an iPod to buy one.

The only bad thing for Apple would be if they created a compatible player, so you could buy a low priced music device and then buy iTMS content, which is basically at cost, without paying the so-called "iPod Tax". It doesn't sound like that's what's happening, though.

Damn. Exactly what I was going to say... down to the letter. So I shall repeat with different words to those listening:

Apple makes pennies on the iTMusicS (the story might be different for shows and games). Some people want to own an iPod, but don't want to pay iTS store prices or use their $0.99/song, end of story, model. Solution: buy mp3, d/l mp3 illegally, buy FairPlay elsewhere. With exception of Real Harmony, the last option has not existed.

Where Apple makes the money is iPod sales. HUGE money. However, Apple can't promote the three aforementioned options outright, not when it has the largest FairPlay (and altogether) legal music d/l store on the 'net. So the only thing they can do is not dissuade people from using the other options... forcefully, at least. All I remember Apple saying about Real Harmony was "they're hackers with questionable methods," or something like that.

As Mr. Green said, the only risk I would see is if others tried to make a FairPlay compatible "mp3" player. I wouldn't see it going places unless sync'd with iTunes or a different phenominal jukebox. Thus, Apple likely writes that possibility off as someone else "pulling a Zune."

hehe. We don't even know how the zune will do in reality but we love to pick on it here. I must be on a Mac Forum. :p

-Clive

---